During the conversation, the player said to me 'you know, looking back, I realise I wasn't really comfortable with some stuff in the game'. Even though most of it was related to a single players actions, that was hard to hear.
So what can we conclude about safety tools? They are a necessary element, but they need to come as part of a more holistic approach that involves making the table a safe space for all to play.
This time we're going to look at a mechanic that changed the way I look at the process of character creation: the playbook.
The process of character creation is a framing device. It shows us as players what the game cares about, how we are supposed to navigate it and what is likely to be important going forward.
This article is about one of D&D three pillars. The previous articles, an introduction, combat and social pillars.
I'd posit that while social interaction is often the most thrilling or engaging part most RPG games, it's maybe a difficult master to serve.
The clash of weapons, the thudding of bodies into each other, the split second moments where it can get totally out of hand, the variations of wounds.
It's time to talk about D&D.
When you have a small number of players who want to tell a slightly bigger story or a small group but lots of ideas, you can create a situation where people play more than one character.
So why are we discussing a German Marxist playwright from the forties? Well, I think Brecht's viewpoint is also relevant to RPG play.